How should we read a monograph? | The British AcademyA decade ago, in my first year as lecturer in a humanities department, an eminent professor helped me secure a book contract with a top university press for my recently completed doctoral thesis. It only sold a few hundred copies: enough to make the press happy, and to give me annual royalties of a fiver. There is an ebook, comparable in price to the physical version, but no open-access version. We may do so in an attempt to earn academic fame. But the career kickback for me was rapid promotion.
The difference between books and journals.
Q. What is the difference between a monograph and a serial?
Schnapp is general editor of the metaLABprojects series, a project of Harvard University Press, which, according to his posting, intends to create. Some observers might see all this as a natural step in the emergence of a new scholarly dynamic—of course the first thing to do is interrogate and define the field, its tools, and its context. Others might see it as evidence that these new transdisciplinary, transformat, transwhatever scholarly products are not suited to traditional or maybe even serious scholarship at all. Still others will see it as evidence for the emergence of a new field of legitimate and rigorous scholarly investigation: the nature of scholarship itself in a radically different new world of communication. All three [of the books in the metaLABprojects series] converge upon questions of emerging knowledge forms and the future of institutions of learning in ways that are rooted in traditional humanistic questions of historical inquiry, interpretation, and critical analysis but that extend a friendly hand to an expanded reading public. In research libraries and I suspect, in scholarly publishing circles it is a rarely—and only grumpily—acknowledged truth that even in the print era, scholarly monographs were very often skimmed and searched rather than deeply read. By acknowledging and welcoming such an approach, the books in question break a taboo.
Getting all sorts of confusing advice, and not knowing how to move on? Let us help you out of the dilemma! There are two main types of dissertations. One is the monograph, and the other is the paper-based dissertation:. But, with the growing importance of academic papers peer-reviewed articles and the simultaneous declining importance of scholarly works published as a book monograph in many disciplines, this has shifted. So one determining factor is the research area in which you work. Also, different countries still have different preferences, or are about to shift from monograph to paper-based dissertations.
Press monographs and handbooks are authoritative professional reference books, textbooks, and handbooks covering theory, state-of-the-art applications, and outlooks on topics of special interest to scientists and engineers. Formats and pricing details are shown on the book product pages. - D2L embed. Instructors: Copy the text below and paste it into the "insert stuff" area in D2L to insert this guide into your D2L class.
In this post I shall substantiate my claim by describing and commenting on the main differences between a typical thesis and a good scholarly book. Comment: The difference in purpose, as in author and readership below , means that the thesis and monograph are profoundly different. Book: It is a book and normally is produced to professional publishing standards. Comment: Producing a book-like thesis is risky but may be unavoidable. My previous post explores this issue.