Frankenstein vs. FrankensteinIn , a book titled Frankenstein was published anonymously, mysteriously dedicated to William Godwin, a prominent journalist and political philosopher of his time. The immediate reviews of the novel were mixed, most edging towards critical, although no one knew who the book was written by. However, while Frankenstein failed to gain popularity immediately, no one had any idea the lasting impact this novel would have on the world. Despite the lukewarm reception at its debut, it soon proved to be. All the changes that can occur tend to change the meaning of the story a little which is why the original is almost always better. There are many things that can be different between the original books.
Novel/Movie Difference Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Essay
I like your thesis, and I completely agree with the point you are trying to make. One thing that confuses me, though, is your first body paragraph. It seems to recap the start of the book, and then the last sentence is just a continuation of your thesis, which is not backed up by the information in the paragraph. If you decide to revise this essay, I would suggest that you at least shorten this paragraph, and maybe add it to your intro, since they seem to be closely related. Other than the first paragraph, you used quotes and evidence from the book very well. Just one proofreading thing in the last sentence of the last body paragraph -- you used difference twice.
There is little doubt that Frankenstein is one of the most well-known and most celebrated stories in history. Mary Shelley came up with the idea for her masterpiece at a young age, and the book was published in There have been many famous films about Frankenstein and his monstrous creation. First and foremost, because of the movie productions of the celebrated novel, a common misconception has risen throughout the years. Because of this, many people falsely believe that Frankenstein is the name of the monster or creation, whereas it is the name of the scientist.